OPINION | Trump’s re-election prospects
If the impeachment hearings this week are any guide, it will have to be the court of public opinion, not the court of the Senate, that removes President Donald Trump.
Increasingly, though, the pundits and commentariat are saying that Trump will be re-elected. If anything, that could be read as a good sign, seeing how many of them, including me, have got it so wrong in recent elections.
In the critical first full day of the impeachment hearings his week, the Senate voted along strict party lines in favour of Trump on important procedural points. Everything suggests that the party line will hold and Trump will be acquitted.
It will prove that campaign funds for Senators are more important than evidence. Bear in mind that this impeachment is not like the previous three where the President was somewhat entrapped by process and cover-up rather than doing something all on his own accord.
So will Trump be sworn in for a second term in a year’s time? Many people think that a sitting President routinely gets re-elected, but history shows otherwise. Almost a quarter have not been. And of those 10 who were not re-elected, six were Republicans, three were Democrats and one was from a time before the two parties existed.
For what it is worth, historian Allan Lichtman in “The Keys to the White House” developed 13 diagnostic questions to predict presidential elections. If six are false, the sitting President is predicted to lose the popular vote. Lichtman’s “keys” have been astonishingly accurate in the past. He predicted the Trump win, but thought he would get the popular vote, which he did not.
The 13 keys are electoral; economic; and foreign/military.
Against Trump are the taint of scandal and the mid-term loss. But on the other 11 he is looking good. He is incumbent. There was no serious contest for the party nomination. He passes the two economic tests. That the economic good news was caused at great environmental and fiscal cost does not matter.
He wins the charisma key, unless the Democrats get a better candidate than any of the present lot. Joe Biden is about as charismatic as his brown shoes. And Trump’s foreign and military policies, while a bit chaotic, are at least active. Also there has been no sustained social unrest.
However, there are nine moths to go. A foreign or military catastrophe is possible. So, too, is an economic downturn.
Lichtman puts no store in a lot of the usual tipster’s guides to re-election, especially polling data and advertising. He assumes, possibly correctly, that once the campaign is on voters dismiss much of the advertising as worthless spin.
It means, tellingly, that all those corporate donations amount to precious little in determining the result. But maybe that is not what they are for. The corporate donations are not made to influence the result of elections. That is why so many corporations donate to both sides. The donations are only made to influence, after the election, the actions of whoever happens to be elected.
On the Lichtman keys, Trump is headed for re-election. But there is a good case for saying that this time it is different. It is different because of Twitter.
Sure, other Presidents have spoken directly to the American people in televised addresses from the Oval Offie or in the Fireside Chats of President Roosevelt. But these direct appeals were choreographied and deliberated upon before they went out.
But with Trump, no other presidency has been so erratic. This is the first President who could Tweet his 150 characters of usually stream-of-consciousness jibberish directly to the American people without a second thought. No-one checks them for consistency or even legality, let alone taste or good sense.
That is rebounding. True, Lichtman says polls do not matter in the assessment of the re-electability of a President, but the latest CNN poll is perhaps different.
It says 70 per cent of voters are following the impeachment proceedings with great or moderate interest. And it says that 51 per cent of them think Trump should be removed from office.
Sure, polls to not go to everyone. Many people refuse to answer or are uncontactable. But those people are the sort of people who do not go out to vote anyway.
The poll suggests people are sick of Trump and his antics. You cannot fool a majority of the people for a whole term, even if his base remains doggedly attached.
It is here that the seventh of Lichtman’s 13 keys could prove crucial. It is policy change: The question is did the incumbent administration effect major changes in national policy.
Here superficially Trump might well get a True. But deep down the electorate might well put it down as a False. There is no Mexican Wall, let alone Mexico paying for it. There has been no repatriation of jobs to the American rust-belt states from China. There has been no huge withdrawal of US troops from abroad nor any take-up of western military expenditure by others. Protectionism and trade wars with China have only cost American businesses and jobs.
In short, the dishonesty, corruption, deception and delusion are being seen for what they are by the American electorate. The Tweet tirades – designed to get short-term gratification and approval – in the long term are proving to be corrosive of the Tweeter’s credibility.
The Senate trial will only harden this view. Americans see the trial process in other cases on their televisions all the time – lawyers presenting their respective cases and jurors diligently weighing the evidence and coming to a decision based upon it.
Seventy percent of them disagreed with the party-line decision of the Senate not to allow evidence beyond what was brought up in the House. They want a full and proper process.
What is happening in the Senate is not the American Way.
Based on this week’s proceedings, fair-minded Americans will very likely see it as a partisan farce and be motivated to fix it in another court – the court of public opinion.
The much bigger question is whether Trump, whose personality and actions mirror those of many tinpot dictators around the world, will accept the voters’ decision if it goes against him or whether embarrassing procedural jack-hammers have to be called in to evict him from the White House.
Crispin Hull is a current columnist and former Editor of the Canberra Times.
Have an opinion or point of view on one of our stories or a community issue? Please submit a Letter to the Editor here.
* Readers are encouraged to use their full details to ensure letter legitimacy. Letters are the opinions of readers and do not represent the views of Newsport or its staff. Letters containing unlawful, obscene, defamatory, personal or abusive material will not be published.
Got a great news tip or video? We'd love to see it. Send news tips to firstname.lastname@example.org
Comments are the opinions of readers and do not represent the views of Newsport or its staff.
Reader comments on this site are moderated before publication to promote valuable, civil, and healthy community debate. Our moderation takes into consideration these guidelines and rules before comments are approved for publication.