Calling for a commitment for the ferry service to remain ‘in perpetuity’, the DSSG is proposing an overhaul of policy to cope with increasing traffic, and a levy on visitors for conservation, presentation and community infrastructure.

“We believe two ferries would relieve congestion, but it will come at a cost to travellers and that there will always need to be a limit on the amount of traffic carried across the river to avoid major upgrade of the road north.

“We are proposing the introduction of a centralised booking system for visitors in busy times; priority lanes for locals on both sides; the development of the Gateway (western precinct) to include a self-funded interpretive centre, a coffee shop and a shuttle bus service to Cape Tribulation on the North side,” said Berwick.

Berwick said the Daintree cannot accommodate an endless increase in self-drive visitors, or we will end up with a bridge and highway, threatening both the environment and presentation, ultimately ruining the experience.

Founded in 2005, the Douglas Shire Sustainability Group (DSSG) is an environmental advocacy group. Its members include Douglas Shire Mayor Julia Leu, Councillor David Carey, his partner Roisin Allen, who is a committee member, and Didge McDonald, who is the president.

Berwick believes one-off travellers can cope with a queue, while locals have more pressing needs and they should be able to cross regularly.

“This is where the Daintree Ferry Experience comes in. If visitors know there is going to be a delay, they can book their crossing time and still enjoy the Daintree by going on a river tour, or visit the interpretive centre while waiting to cross. This provides options; it alleviates the line-ups and ensures the locals are catered to.”

The DSSG is also proposing the introduction of a visitor levy to pay for conservation, presentation and community infrastructure.

A $4 levy once existed but according to the DSSG, Council accounted for it separately and called it a levy, there was an opinion that it was not legal and it was shut down.

“Concerns by businesses that it would turn people away have proven false as the cost has increased well beyond the combined charge and levy at the time and numbers have continued to increase.”

Berwick said surveys have shown visitors are happy to pay a modest levy provided money is spent on the environment and its presentation.

He cited Kuranda as an example where a $1/person levy on the train or Skyrail pays for visitor infrastructure under the guidance of a local board.

“We are proposing that 50% of the money generated (from the levy) be spent on the community as they receive limited benefit from tourism with few employed in tourism or having a tourism business.

”We are also proposing that the Daintree Coast community be charged with advising how the community money is spent and advising on conservation priorities, through an elected board or committee.

“This is about empowering the community and financing that empowerment. They might want a community hall, or assistance with their Remote Area Power, a library or sporting facilities. It should be their money and their choice,” he said.

Information on the tender process can be seen here.

Join the conversation

Thumb up or thumb down or place a comment below.

* Readers are encouraged to use their full details below to ensure comment legitimacy. Comments are the opinions of readers and do not represent the views of Newsport or its staff. Comments containing unlawful, obscene, defamatory, personal or abusive material will not be published.